Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Support
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
D
Django LDP
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Charts
  • Issues 20
    • Issues 20
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 5
    • Merge Requests 5
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Charts
  • Packages
    • Packages
    • Container Registry
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Charts
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • Startin blox
  • djangoldp-packages
  • Django LDP
  • Issues
  • #194

Closed
Open
Opened Nov 14, 2019 by Jean-Baptiste Pasquier@jbpasquier
  • Report abuse
Report abuse

Up depth of models

As LDFlex have some issues with performances, we could try to help it handling datas by raising depth of our models.

For testing, we have to use the currently-in-dev version of sib-core (branch bugfix/performances-ldflex, may be published soon)

Questions are:

  • Should we set default depth of djangoldp higher than 0? That could mean that we don't have to change our models but only djangoldp to make it works.
  • Decide which depth by model? More than 1 could give some redundancy: [0] Circle -> [1] Owner (User) -> [2] Circles (Circle)

@balessan @sylvain @christophehenry

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: startinblox/djangoldp-packages/djangoldp#194