Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Support
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
D
Djangoldp Conversations
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Charts
  • Issues 0
    • Issues 0
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Charts
  • Packages
    • Packages
    • Container Registry
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Charts
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • Startin blox
  • djangoldp-packages
  • Djangoldp Conversations
  • Issues
  • #5

Closed
Open
Opened Aug 09, 2019 by Benoit Alessandroni@balessan
  • Report abuse
Report abuse

author_user relations should be IDUrlField

I think that in order to build fully federated/distributed web applications, we need to generalize the use of the IDUrlField instead of the ForeignKey relations in our packages models.

In the case of the conversation packages, both author_user properties in both the Conversation and Message models should be switched to IDUrlField.

I will need it for Coopstarter by the way, as any User of any instances should be able to comment and give feedback about a resource.

@matthieu @sylvain what do you think ?

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: startinblox/djangoldp-packages/djangoldp-conversations#5